Morality and God Essay

Morality only when exists if we recall in immortal at that placefore if divinity doesnt exist there is no lessonity. there require been so some(prenominal) evil acts committed in the piss of theology that it is difficult to maintain that a belief in perfection equates to lessonity. thither ar situations that happen every day where decisions ar do based off of gentle by advancedss that contradict the word of god. Morality comes from within, it is an understanding of right versus awry(p) and the ability to choose what is right. Knowing all this a belief in idol is non a requirement for a mortal to be lesson. (Mosser, 2011) We are taught that moralistics are basically the dissimilarity between right and wrong.A fry may be taught that theft is wrong beca drill it hurts the store owner and rouse ruin the childs reputation. Or the child may be told that if they steal they will be penalise because God is always watching. The child has learned the fundamental fight between right and wrong, even if the reasoning is different. This will allow the child to make moral decisions when they grow up whether it is based off of hu human beings compassion or business concern of God. If we accept that the child understands right from wrong regardless of their reason, we accept that God is non a requirement to be a moral mortal.If a person observes an act of violence or torture, they are morally required to stop it. In biblical measure these acts were not only accepted scarce encouraged by the bible. Today, a person would not trim back these things simply because they did not believe in God. thither are human rights that we believe individually person is entitle to and some iodin with good morals would help out another person in need because it is the right thing to do. If it turned out that God does not exist, violence and torture would not suddenly become acceptable. (Mosser, 2011) sens acceptance of a belief does not make it right.Ancien t holinesss that believed in numerous gods engage been pushed aside as fairy tales, for the more wide accepted belief in a single God. During their time those gods were prayed to equitable as fervently as todays God. What was accepted as true back and then is now hunch forwardn as a fable, and the laws of the day have been wiped away and re bureaud with our modern laws. These laws were put in to place to punish mass who do wrong to others. They have become the moral balance. If you do wrong you will be punished, if you continue to do what is right you will live unmolested and enjoy your freedoms.God is not a requirement for someone to act morally, because there are earthly punishments for crimes. on that point is no right or wrong without God because He turn backs what is right and wrong. Moral ideals cannot be enforced without God to ensure that we are punished or rewarded for our acts. Someone who does not believe in God may change their morals to whatever suits them at t he time. We have been given guidelines by God on what is morally acceptable, and informed of the punishment that comes with being immoral. When an unmarried does not believe in God they cannot be a moral person, because they have no moral standards.(Millard, A. 2000) The Ten Commandments give us a basic understanding of what is right and wrong. These Commandments along with various scriptures from the bible determine which acts are moral and which are immoral. An individual who witnesses a crime but does not believe in God can simply fix that they are not responsible for stopping the crime. This may lead one to believe that if a non-believer does something right that they have morals. This is not the case, because they could just as easily do wrong and their conscience would have been just as clear.They have no moral compass to declaim them that this act is atomic number 82 them astray from God. (Riskin, S. 2007) If one does not believe in God they cannot know right from wrong a nd cannot do what is right because they do not have the understanding. The lack of a belief in God means that rules do not have to be followed. If you do not fear the ire of God, there is nothing to stop you from committing immoral acts, or any crimes for that matter. every situation can be overlooked because there is no fear of punishment without a fear of God.Only a person with a firm belief in God can be involveed moral because they fear His punishment and desire his reward. God is the only person neat enough to enforce moral standards, without his guidance there can be no binding morals. Moral standards come from God and without Him a person cannot be moral. When we talk in absolutes we ignore possibilities that exist outside of our beliefs. at that place are umteen examples of individuals that believed in God who acted immorally, as well as examples of batch who do not believe in God playing with good morals. Their beliefs do not determine their worship, their acts do.I f we are to base morality only when on a belief in God then which believer do we follow? Do we follow the believer who commits crimes, or only the believer who is an upstanding member of society? Adolf Hitler was raised as a Catholic, and in his adult life spoke of his religious beliefs. He wanted to create a pure Germany, through a religion known as positive Christianity. Positive Christianity removed the Jewish elements from the standard Christianity doctrine and replaced them with Nazi philosophy. More than six million Jewish people were killed during the Holocaust in the ideal of positive Christianity.Bill Gates is celebrated as saying he does not know if there is a God or not, yet he donates billions of dollars to Charity every year. The nates he formed with his wife to address extreme poverty and shortsighted health in third world countries has brought attention and relief to millions of people across the globe. These acts were not done in the hopes that they would be rewa rded, but sooner to help the human condition. A general concern about the wellbeing of our neighbors is not exclusive to God. Not every action is based solely off of a persons morals.There are many reasons people decide to do things and we cannot judge a persons moral standing off of a single action. We do not look at Adolf Hitler and say that he is a great moral figure because he believed in God. On the same note we do not look at Bill Gates, a non-believer and say that he is immoral. We look at their actions over time and determine whether or not they acted morally. We know that killing millions of innocent people is immoral just as we know that helping sick and injured people is moral. Which God you believe in determines what you consider to be moral.Muslims harmonise that polygamy is acceptable. Protestants and the Jewish believe disunite is acceptable if certain conditions are met. Catholics are strictly against both polygamy and divorce. Which God is morally right? All of these groups worship the same God, so perchance it is the translation of the word of God that is in question. When we look at this we go to have a better understanding that Gods strange words could bring the thought of what is moral crumbling down. There are many controversial moral endorsements in the bible that are accepted today.There are also commands given that are ignored because they are no longer socially accepted as truth. Exodus 2013 says we must not kill. However, Leviticus 2013 tells us that if a man lies with another man he must be put to death. There are many debates and arguments over whether homosexuality is moral, but we overlook the game part of the scripture because it is no longer held as a effectual punishment. The times have changed and we cannot murder or we will go to jail. Leviticus 1919 says it is a sin to wear clothes made from deuce different types of material.You will be hard pressed to find anyone climb up this claim today. (King James Bible) Many religious people have chosen scripture from the bible to suit their lifestyles over the years, but ignore things that are no longer socially accepted as immoral. They deem others to strict standards on matters that they do not agree on and use verses from the bible to support their viewpoint. If everyone used the internal right versus wrong onslaught to morality there would be less confusion on which standards we held each other to.It is unfair to condemn someone for something using half of a statement from the bible, and then ignore the rest of the statement because it does not agree with current beliefs. Our faith, lessons from our parents or even witnessing other peoples actions are different reasons to decide what we believe is moral. All three have flaws that can lead to differing views on the same subject. However, at the end of the day there are certain things that everyone accepts as morally right, or morally wrong. These are situations where it does not matter how you le arned it, you just know it.Biblical teachings tell us that certain things are acceptable, while others are punishable by death. But in the legal society of America acting on the acceptable things will land you in prison, and the immoral sins are inviolable rights. Every day decisions are made across the world without having to consider if we will be punished by a higher being. These things settle that a person does not have to believe in God to act morally. A moral person is someone who not only understands the difference between right and wrong, but also does what is right.The lack of God in someones life doesnt make a person immoral just as the presence of God does not make someone moral. Morality is not proven by a belief in God. References King James Bible Millard, A. (2000). How reliable is hegira? Biblical Archaeology Review, 26(4), 50-57. Retrieved from http//search. proquest. com/docview/214908737? accountid=32521 Mosser, K. (2011). Logic an introduction. San Diego Bridge point Education, Inc. Riskin, S. (2007). Ten commandments audience? Washington Jewish Week. Retrieved from http//search. proquest. com/docview/220857354? accountid=32521.